netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPv6: NS -> NA reply RFC2461 SHOULD considerations [patch]

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv6: NS -> NA reply RFC2461 SHOULD considerations [patch]
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 17:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105030033560.32077-200000@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105030033560.32077-200000@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Pekka Savola writes:
 > Warning: the patch has not been tested extensively, but compiles and
 > doesn't seem to cause too major side effects. Double check for
 > sanity / better way to do it.

Please let me know if you'd like me to apply this patch, it looks
fine to me.  You could combine it with the other ndisc changes
you posted today plus the net_ratelimit() work I've asked for.

Thanks.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@xxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>