| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6: Incoming RA source-address may be non- link-local |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 May 2001 17:26:02 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105031339460.13399-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105021312080.28386-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105031339460.13399-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Pekka Savola writes: > On Wed, 2 May 2001, Pekka Savola wrote: > > In net/ipv6/ndisc, ndisc_router_discovery function, where IPv6 router > > advertisements are being processed, there is no check that RA is coming > > from link-local address. > > The following patch (note! untested!) should do it. Copied with small > modification to the printk from ndisc_redirect_rcv: > > --- ndisc.c~ Mon Apr 30 12:12:44 2001 > +++ ndisc.c Thu May 3 13:32:37 2001 > @@ -587,6 +587,11 @@ I would really like to see these kernel messages properly net_ratelimit()'d. Once you test this patch for proper functionalty, could you net_ratelimit() the printk's in this file as well and send me the updated patch? Thanks. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NETDEV_CHANGE events when __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER is modified, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6: NS -> NA reply RFC2461 SHOULD considerations [patch], David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPv6: Incoming RA source-address may be non- link-local, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | IPv6: Neighbor discovery diagnostics utility for Linux?, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |