[Top] [All Lists]

RE: obvious ndisc.c bug

To: Ra Chen <Ra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: obvious ndisc.c bug
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <92C0C0AC8AE8D411864300105A835CBB50A5B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <92C0C0AC8AE8D411864300105A835CBB50A5B4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> I think a multicast packet is a packet with multicast destination address.
> Am I wrong?
> It's impossible for a source address to be multicast, right?
> Where's the "similar code"?  As I noticed line 1015 and 1043 both check
> "daddr" for being multicast.

You're right, I've made the change.

David S. Miller

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>