Re: pmtu discovery [PATCH]

netdev

Re: pmtu discovery [PATCH]

from [kuznet]

To:	Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: pmtu discovery [PATCH]
From:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:20:44 +0400 (MSK DST)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<2D6CADE9B0C6D411A27500508BB3CBD0013C792F@eseis15nok> from "Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx" at Apr 19, 1 11:15:01 pm
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hello!

> ...as i am not sure about the approach...comments so
> that i can improve it??? 

It looks mostly right. Though, apparently, such routes are to be marked
with a flag.


> cvs) against the 2.4.3 versions.....i also am not sure at which other places
> this may affect (maybe tcp!)...

No doubts. Additional header modifies calculation of mss.
Though it should contribute to tp->exthdr_len.


>                       the patch is completely untested (i dunno
> even if it compiles)...

8)

Alexey

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
pmtu discovery [PATCH], Imran . Patel Re: pmtu discovery [PATCH], kuznet <=

Previous by Date:	pmtu discovery [PATCH], Imran . Patel
Next by Date:	Re: obvious ndisc.c bug, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	pmtu discovery [PATCH], Imran . Patel
Next by Thread:	scheduler, Dhiman Barman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]