| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: frag id byte order (PATCH) |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:14:40 +1200 |
| Cc: | Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15068.43560.329884.817170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:40:08PM -0700 |
| References: | <2D6CADE9B0C6D411A27500508BB3CBD0013C7923@eseis15nok> <15068.43560.329884.817170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:40:08PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
Imran.Patel@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Anycase, i have attached the patch (against ip6_output.c/kernel 2.4.3)
below
> (notice that some people will do anything to get their name in the kernel
> sources:)
I've applied your patch, thanks a lot.
I thought frag_id was an opaque value and hence so long as it is
consistent it need matter here?
--cw
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: thank's for answering, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: frag id byte order (PATCH), Imran . Patel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: frag id byte order (PATCH), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: frag id byte order (PATCH), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |