| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack] |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Mar 2001 23:35:29 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, feldy@xxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15017.14060.373448.198308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "David S. Miller" at Mar 9, 1 12:02:52 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > He's using fragmented UDP packets, so the lazy receive defrag stuff > (ie. 2 copies turn into 1) work wonders. _No_ copy on softirq. It is more important. It is the reason why all the tricks with backlog are not essential. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |