| To: | Rabeeh Khoury <rabeeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Help on a network driver ... |
| From: | David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Feb 2001 18:16:34 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <059f01c09083$82ed9e20$6800000a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A811B95.4080303@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> The reason for that is that the TCP layer doesn't accept any packet that > the pkt_type is not a PACKET_HOST. This feature was added to TCP layer > in order to distnguish between packets that are for the host and packets > which are not, which is usually noticed when the port works in > promiscuous mode ! Turns out pkt_type may have figured in the problem (didn't look too much at that code) because some intermediate layer set pkt_type to the wrong value -- not the driver, a multicast bit in the MAC address was set wrong. Nothing gave a diagnostic. - Dave |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: docs on network device driver design, 2.4 vs 2.2, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [UPDATE] zerocopy patch against 2.4.2-pre2, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Help on a network driver ... [strange TCP problems], Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | [UPDATE] New zerocopy patch., David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |