netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: zerocopy results on GigE

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: zerocopy results on GigE
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Feb 2001 23:02:54 +0100
Cc: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: "David S. Miller"'s message of "Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:36:32 -0800 (PST)"
References: <20010206194919.A633@xxxxxxxxx> <14976.28256.593782.781889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4
>>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

David> Pekka Pietikainen writes:
>> Jumbo frames, sender is dual pIII/500 with 32/66 PCI, receiver a
>> dual pII/450 with 32/33, both have 1MB Alteons. CPU use is measured
>> using cyclesoak.  SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF set to 512k, no other
>> sockopts touched.

David> Strange, cpu usage is close to nothing for sendfile cases yet
David> full bandwidth is not obtained.  Here is what I am getting on
David> UltraSparc systems:

One thing that might be worth investigating is that the AceNIC has
a high latency for reading buffer descriptors. One of the plans I have
is to linearize small skb's before handing them to the NIC.

Jes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>