Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project

[Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:22 +0100,
Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > >                 + enabling default route when ipv6 forwarding is 
> > > > enabled,
> > > Is this really needed? It is a very good feature, that default route is
> > > not available when ipv6 forwarding (most of IPv6 address space should
> > > never be forwarded by a default route).
> > 
> > For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in
> > leaf sites ? All router should have full routes ?
> No just a route for all unicast addresses: 2000::/3 (AFAIR) 
> And (maybe) something similar for multicast (if no better multicast
> routing is available)

Actually it means default route. I can't see why you announce or add
statically the route instead of default route.

-- Yuji Sekiya