[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project

To: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project
From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 19:20:07 +0900
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010205105822.A3443@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Keio University
References: <ur91dim0j.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010205101710.B2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <uhf29iivu.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010205105822.A3443@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.4.1 (Stand By Me) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
At Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:22 +0100,
Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > >                 + enabling default route when ipv6 forwarding is 
> > > > enabled,
> > > Is this really needed? It is a very good feature, that default route is
> > > not available when ipv6 forwarding (most of IPv6 address space should
> > > never be forwarded by a default route).
> > 
> > For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in
> > leaf sites ? All router should have full routes ?
> No just a route for all unicast addresses: 2000::/3 (AFAIR) 
> And (maybe) something similar for multicast (if no better multicast
> routing is available)

Actually it means default route. I can't see why you announce or add
statically the route instead of default route.

-- Yuji Sekiya

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>