[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project
From: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:22 +0100
In-reply-to: <uhf29iivu.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:22:45PM +0900
Mail-followup-to: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <ur91dim0j.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010205101710.B2754@xxxxxxxxxxx> <uhf29iivu.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 06:22:45PM +0900, Yuji Sekiya wrote:
> If you have IPv6 addresses on a interface, a better source address
> is selected automatically.
> > >           + enabling default route when ipv6 forwarding is enabled,
> > Is this really needed? It is a very good feature, that default route is
> > not available when ipv6 forwarding (most of IPv6 address space should
> > never be forwarded by a default route).
> For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in
> leaf sites ? All router should have full routes ?
No just a route for all unicast addresses: 2000::/3 (AFAIR) 
And (maybe) something similar for multicast (if no better multicast
routing is available)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>