[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project

To: pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project
From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:39:08 +0900
Cc: jajcus@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: In your message of "Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:31:04 +0000" <E14PhzE-0003lS-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Keio University
References: <uhf29iivu.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E14PhzE-0003lS-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) REMI/1.14.1 (Mushigawaōsugi) Chao/1.14.0 (Momoyama) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.7 (i386-*-nt5.0.2195) MULE/4.1 (AOI) Meadow/IPv6-1.13 Beta1++ (TANAHASHI:61)
At Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:31:04 +0000,
Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in
> >leaf sites ? All router should have full routes ?
> I don't see why not.  A leaf site's provider ought to be able to aggregate 
> the routes sufficiently that there would only be a manageable number.

>From IPv6 address allocation policy, TLAs should aggregate their routes,
but behavior of NLAs and SLAs are not defined. Then I think it is reasonable
that we can choice whether purging default route or not.

-- Yuji Sekiya @ USAGI Project

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>