packet (ppp) over Sonet in Linux, Ben Greear, 2001/01/30

• Re: packet (ppp) over Sonet in Linux, James R. Leu, 2001/01/30
  • Re: packet (ppp) over Sonet in Linux, John Fraizer, 2001/01/31

[UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/30

• Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/30
  • Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/30
• Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, Tom Rini, 2001/01/30
• Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, Malcolm Beattie, 2001/01/31
  • Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/31

More measurements, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/29

• Re: More measurements, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/30
  • Re: More measurements, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: More measurements, kuznet, 2001/01/30
    • Re: More measurements, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: More measurements, Andrey Savochkin, 2001/01/30
• Re: More measurements, kuznet, 2001/01/30
• Re: More measurements, Jes Sorensen, 2001/01/30
  • Re: More measurements, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: More measurements, David S. Miller, 2001/01/30

ECN: Clearing the air, jamal, 2001/01/27

• Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal, 2001/01/27
  • Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/27
    • Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal, 2001/01/27
    • Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Pavel Machek, 2001/01/29
    • Re: ECN: Clearing the air, Walter Hofmann, 2001/01/29
    • Re: ECN: Clearing the air, jamal, 2001/01/29

[PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), John Fremlin, 2001/01/27

• Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), Albert D. Cahalan, 2001/01/28
  • Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/29
    • Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), Jamie Lokier, 2001/01/29
    • Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/29
    • Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), John Fremlin, 2001/01/29
    • Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), Ralf Baechle, 2001/02/01
  • Re: [PATCH] dynamic IP support for 2.4.0 (SIOCKILLADDR), John Fremlin, 2001/01/29

sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/26

• Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Aaron Lehmann, 2001/01/27
  • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/27
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ion Badulescu, 2001/01/27
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/27
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), David S. Miller, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), David S. Miller, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), David S. Miller, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), David S. Miller, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), kuznet, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), kuznet, 2001/01/31
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), David S. Miller, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/30
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), kuznet, 2001/01/30
• Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ion Badulescu, 2001/01/27
  • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/27
  • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/27
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ion Badulescu, 2001/01/29
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/29
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ion Badulescu, 2001/01/29
    • Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Malcolm Beattie, 2001/01/31
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/31
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to dowith ECN), Rick Jones, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to dowith ECN), jamal, 2001/01/30
    • Re: Still not sexy! (Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing todowith ECN), Rick Jones, 2001/01/30
• Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/27
  • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/27
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), jamal, 2001/01/27
    • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/28
  • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Rick Jones, 2001/01/29
• Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), kuznet, 2001/01/27
  • Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Andrew Morton, 2001/01/27
• RE: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Jonathan Earle, 2001/01/29
  • RE: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Antonin Kral, 2001/01/29

[prepatch] 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/26

• Re: [prepatch] 3c59x.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/26

zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/26

• Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/26
  • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/26
    • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/26
    • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/26
    • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/26
    • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/26
    • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/26
    • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, kuznet, 2001/01/26
• Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, kuznet, 2001/01/26
  • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Bogdan Costescu, 2001/01/26
  • Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/29

TCP Syn Ack function, Rabeeh Khoury, 2001/01/25

• Re: TCP Syn Ack function, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/25

TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98 Followup, Jordan Mendelson, 2001/01/23

• Re: TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98 Followup, Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/25
  • Re: TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98 Followup, Jordan Mendelson, 2001/01/26
    • Re: TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98 Followup, kuznet, 2001/01/27
    • TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98 Logs, Jordan Mendelson, 2001/01/27

internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, mukesh agrawal, 2001/01/17

• Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, jamal, 2001/01/18
• Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/18
  • Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/18
  • Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, jamal, 2001/01/18
  • Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, kuznet, 2001/01/18
    • Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/18
    • Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, kuznet, 2001/01/19

netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/16

• Re: netlink drops messages., kuznet, 2001/01/16
  • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., kuznet, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/18
  • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., kuznet, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., kuznet, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., kuznet, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Werner Almesberger, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Werner Almesberger, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., jamal, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., jamal, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Benjamin C.R. LaHaise, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Benjamin C.R. LaHaise, 2001/01/18
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/19
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/21
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/21
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Werner Almesberger, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., James R. Leu, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., jamal, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Werner Almesberger, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Michael Richardson, 2001/01/17
  • Re: netlink drops messages., jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
• Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/16
  • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Andi Kleen, 2001/01/17
    • Re: netlink drops messages., Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17

Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/14

• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/14
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, kuznet, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, kuznet, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/14
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, kuznet, 2001/01/15
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, kuznet, 2001/01/16
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, Pavel Machek, 2001/01/16
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?, Pavel Machek, 2001/01/16

TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ), James R. Leu, 2001/01/11

• Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ), David S. Miller, 2001/01/11
  • Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ), James R. Leu, 2001/01/11
    • Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ), John Heffner, 2001/01/11
    • Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/12

Updated zerocopy patches on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/11

• Re: Updated zerocopy patches on kernel.org, Stephen Frost, 2001/01/15

[PATCH] fragment, MLD6, and router-alert option, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2001/01/10

• Re: [PATCH] fragment, MLD6 and options (is Re: [PATCH] fragment, MLD6, and router-alert option), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2001/01/10

[Fwd: [PATCH] accept ARP's with HW Type of 1 from IEEE802 devices], Noah Romer, 2001/01/10

• Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] accept ARP's with HW Type of 1 from IEEE802 devices], David S. Miller, 2001/01/10

[PATCH] reassembly in IPv6, Aki M Laukkanen, 2001/01/10

• Re: [PATCH] reassembly in IPv6, David S. Miller, 2001/01/10

Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09

• Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, Jeff Garzik, 2001/01/09
  • Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/11
    • Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, David S. Miller, 2001/01/11
    • Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, kuznet, 2001/01/14
• Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/11
  • Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, Andrew Morton, 2001/01/11
  • Re: Updated zerocopy patch up on kernel.org, Anton Blanchard, 2001/01/13

The networking code in Kernel 2.4, Bernhard Jansen, 2001/01/09

• Re: The networking code in Kernel 2.4, Hans Grobler, 2001/01/09
• Re: The networking code in Kernel 2.4, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/11
  • Re: The networking code in Kernel 2.4, Hans Grobler, 2001/01/11
    • Re: The networking code in Kernel 2.4, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/12

Apparent bug in cls_u32.c, Christopher Neufeld, 2001/01/09

• Re: Apparent bug in cls_u32.c, David S. Miller, 2001/01/10

[PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/07

• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Christoph Hellwig, 2001/01/08
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Rik van Riel, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Christoph Hellwig, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Christoph Hellwig, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen C. Tweedie, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Alan Cox, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen C. Tweedie, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Alan Cox, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Alan Cox, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Jens Axboe, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Andrea Arcangeli, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Jens Axboe, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Andrea Arcangeli, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Jens Axboe, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Andrea Arcangeli, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Rik van Riel, 2001/01/16
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, J Sloan, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen C. Tweedie, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Benjamin C.R. LaHaise, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Benjamin C.R. LaHaise, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen C. Tweedie, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Christoph Hellwig, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Christoph Hellwig, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen C. Tweedie, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Alan Cox, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen C. Tweedie, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen Frost, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen Frost, 2001/01/09
    • storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), dean gaudet, 2001/01/09
    • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch,, Alan Cox, 2001/01/09
    • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), dean gaudet, 2001/01/09
    • Re: storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1), David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Jes Sorensen, 2001/01/08
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Jes Sorensen, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen Frost, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar, 2001/01/09
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Trond Myklebust, 2001/01/09
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Trond Myklebust, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Trond Myklebust, 2001/01/10

[PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/06

• Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David S. Miller, 2001/01/06
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David S. Miller, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, David Ford, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Christopher E. Brown, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, jamal, 2001/01/07
• Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/06
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/06
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David S. Miller, 2001/01/06
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David Ford, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David S. Miller, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David Ford, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Blu3Viper, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Blu3Viper, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David Ford, 2001/01/07
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/07
    • routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Sandy Harris, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Michael Richardson, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOTmeet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/08
    • Re: routable interfaces, kuznet, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, kuznet, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, Ben Greear, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, Francois Desloges, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, Ben Greear, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: routable interfaces, Ben Greear, 2001/01/15
    • Re: routable interfaces, jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/16
    • Re: routable interfaces, jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: routable interfaces, jamal, 2001/01/17
    • Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
    • Re: routable interfaces, jamal, 2001/01/17
    • Re: routable interfaces, kuznet, 2001/01/17
    • Re: routable interfaces, kuznet, 2001/01/16
    • Re: routable interfaces, jamal, 2001/01/16
    • Re: routable interfaces, kuznet, 2001/01/17
    • Re: routable interfaces, Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/17
• Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/06
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David S. Miller, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Gleb Natapov, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), jamal, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumissionpolicy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
  • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Ben Greear, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/06
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks), Ben Greear, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) (Benchmarks), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Ben Greear, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), David S. Miller, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Ben Greear, 2001/01/08
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks), Andi Kleen, 2001/01/09
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Alan Cox, 2001/01/07
    • Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission, Ben Greear, 2001/01/07

Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Jordan Mendelson, 2001/01/05

• Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, David S. Miller, 2001/01/05
  • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Jordan Mendelson, 2001/01/05
• Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Jan Rekorajski, 2001/01/05
  • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, David S. Miller, 2001/01/06
    • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Jan Rekorajski, 2001/01/06
    • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Jan Rekorajski, 2001/01/06
    • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, David S. Miller, 2001/01/06
    • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/07
    • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, David S. Miller, 2001/01/07
• Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, jamal, 2001/01/05
  • Re: Mediocre TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98SE PPP, Jordan Mendelson, 2001/01/07

looking for info about struct tcp_opt, Karl Jonas, 2001/01/05

• Re: looking for info about struct tcp_opt, Andi Kleen, 2001/01/05

Network statistics counters missing 'broadcasts', Matti Aarnio, 2001/01/03

• Network statistics counters missing 'broadcasts', Robert Olsson, 2001/01/03
• Re: Network statistics counters missing 'broadcasts', YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2001/01/03
• Re: Network statistics counters missing 'broadcasts', Chris Wedgwood, 2001/01/03