| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:17:57 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010131064911.B7244@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3A76B72D.2DD3E640@xxxxxxxxxx> <3A728475.34CF841@xxxxxxxxxx> <3A726087.764CC02E@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010126222003.A11994@xxxxxxxxxxx> <14966.22671.446439.838872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14966.47384.971741.939842@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A76D6A4.2385185E@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010131064911.B7244@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Chris Wedgwood writes: > What server are you using here? Using NetApp filers I don't see > anything like this, probably only 8.5MB/s at most and this number is > fairly noisy. 8.5MB/sec sounds like half-duplex 100baseT. Positive you are running at full duplex all the way to the netapp, and if so how many switches sit between you and this netapp? Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | [RFC] tcng: Traffic Control, next generation language, Werner Almesberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |