| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: More measurements |
| From: | Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 30 Jan 2001 21:52:14 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:04:10 +1100" |
| References: | <3A75785A.42B9E7CE@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Andrew> - eepro100 generates more interrupts doing TCP Tx, but not TCP Andrew> Rx. I assume it doesn't do Tx mitigation? Andrew> - Changing eepro100 to use IO operations instead of MMIO slows Andrew> down this dual 500MHz machine by less than one percent at 100 Andrew> mbps. At 12,000 interrupts per second. Why all the fuss about Andrew> MMIO? Ingo or Don Becker (sorry don't remember if it was Ingo or Don) did some tests showing that the write speed to IO ports was about 10 times the slower and read about 5 times slower. There is also the issues of stalling the bus. This may not all show up in actual transmission speeds etc. Jes |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFC] tcng: Traffic Control, next generation language, Werner Almesberger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: More measurements, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: More measurements, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |