| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org |
| From: | Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:59:39 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <14966.35438.429963.405587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:33:34AM -0800 |
| References: | <14966.35438.429963.405587@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.12i |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:33:34AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Have fun testing... I've got a question. I think one of the threads mentioned that this could help NFS performance, in general. I assume having the NFS traffic go out the a card w/ the right HW could help as well, right? Should the 3com 3c905b work, and how can i check it's "working" ? Thanks! -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sendfile+zerocopy: fairly sexy (nothing to do with ECN), Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: More measurements, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [UPDATE] Fresh zerocopy patch on kernel.org, Malcolm Beattie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |