| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jan 2001 05:04:37 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A716447.CF6E8BB0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3A714788.82C064BD@xxxxxxxxxx> <14961.24733.869800.77633@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A716447.CF6E8BB0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andrew Morton writes: > But why do this, rather than create new accounting fields? Let > me guess: short-term thing, intended to be removed, didn't want > to hack the userspace tools? Why add new fields when they are unnecessary? What is hurt by having these fields increment. We can teach programs like ifconfig et al. that for ethernet type interfaces, these fields have this different meaning. Currently, ifconfig will not even display this statistic for ethernet type netdevices, one has to go probing by hand to spot them from user space. If people are going to be really pedantic about this, then I'll just kill this usage in the final patch I send to Linus. But I personally think it is not such a big deal and it will assist with debugging. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |