| To: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c |
| From: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jan 2001 20:46:48 +1100 |
| Cc: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, Alexey.
/* Tx timeout interval (millisecs) */
-static int watchdog = 400;
+static int watchdog = 5000;
Five second transmit timeout. Why is this?
And why do we do this:
vp->stats.rx_compressed++;
each time we send a frame with hardware checksum? This is the
transmit path, not the receive path. It seems we're abusing
some ppp-related stats here. What's up?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP Performance 2.4.0 <-> Win98 Followup, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | TCP Syn Ack function, Rabeeh Khoury |
| Next by Thread: | Re: zerocopy changes in 3c59x.c, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |