| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16 |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:43:47 +1300 |
| Cc: | mukesh agrawal <mukesh@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010118125132.A3272@xxxxxxxxxx>; from ak@xxxxxx on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 12:51:32PM +0100 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101171931200.5704-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010118125132.A3272@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 12:51:32PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
The common problem of the dynamic IP changing is already mostly
but not completelycovered by the ip_dynaddr socket address
rewrite hack. The main problem left in there is in the user
space resolver library btw with its too short timeout.
is there any reason why the ip_dynaddr stuff can't be compiled out
for those like myself who find it an esthetically unpleasant kernel
hack to solve a user-land problem?
--cw
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netlink drops messages., Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netlink drops messages., jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: internal drops with tcp, kernel 2.2.16, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |