netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: netlink drops messages.

To: Werner Almesberger <Werner.Almesberger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: netlink drops messages.
From: "James R. Leu" <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:55:37 -0600
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010117212824.O18286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Werner.Almesberger@xxxxxxx on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:28:24PM +0100
Organization: none
References: <200101161848.VAA31729@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010116131456.E1299@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010117040542.Y18286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010117121532.B1830@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010117074952.C2459@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010117171310.A5589@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010117110035.G2459@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010117184852.A7146@xxxxxxxxxx> <20010117125405.J2459@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010117212824.O18286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:28:24PM +0100, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> James R. Leu wrote:
> > and relegate Linux to be an embedded trampoline for them to run there own
> > IP stack in user land.
> 
> Whee, "KA9Q outperforms Linux kernel TCP/IP". Mindcraft special at nine
> on MSNBC ;-))

I guess I should clarify that a bit ;-)

Remember that routing/switching vendors have a hardware fast path.  The
signalling or routing protocol packets are the only traffic that go to the
route/switch processor.  Protocol developers look for features of the IP
stack not neccessarily speed.  If the IP stack doesn't provide enough features
why use it?

Jim

> - Werner
> 
> -- 
>   _________________________________________________________________________
>  / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH           Werner.Almesberger@xxxxxxx /
> /_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/

-- 
James R. Leu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>