On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 09:48:48PM +0300, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > You didn't say "retransmission" of missed netlink information, you said
> > "resynchronize doing dumps". These are completly differnt things.
> Think a bit.
About what? How silly it is to think that netlink isn't reliable?
> > If netlink can't provide reliable update information then it needs to be
> > changed.
> If you will invent a way to reliably store N bytes having
> storage of only 1 byte, you will make a revolution in technique. 8)
I'm not asking for the impossible. Sequence numbers and/or client
to server ACKs would solve the problem.
James R. Leu