| To: | sct@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:18:06 -0800 |
| Cc: | mingo@xxxxxxx, sct@xxxxxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010109151725.D9321@xxxxxxxxxx> (sct@xxxxxxxxxx) |
| References: | <20010109141806.F4284@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101091532150.4368-100000@e2> <20010109151725.D9321@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:17:25 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx> Jes has also got hard numbers for the performance advantages of jumbograms on some of the networks he's been using, and you ain't going to get udp jumbograms through a page-by-page API, ever. Again, see MSG_MORE in the patches. It is possible and our UDP implementation could make it easily. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Stephen Frost |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |