| To: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 |
| From: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:38:28 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010109183808.A12128@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > ever seen, this is why i quoted it - the talk was about block-IO
> > > performance, and Stephen said that our block IO sucks. It used to suck,
> > > but in 2.4, with the right patch from Jens, it doesnt suck anymore. )
> >
> > Thats fine. Get me 128K-512K chunks nicely streaming into my raid controller
> > and I'll be a happy man
>
> No problem, apply blk-13B and you'll get 512K chunks for SCSI and RAID.
i cannot agree more - Jens' patch did wonders to IO performance here. It
fixes a long-standing bug in the Linux block-IO-scheduler that caused very
suboptimal requests being issued to lowlevel drivers once the request
queue gets full. I think this patch is a clear candidate for 2.4.x
inclusion.
Ingo
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Ingo Molnar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Jens Axboe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1, Andrea Arcangeli |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |