[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)

To: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (New Benchmarks)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:00:45 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3A597665.4B68C39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Ben Greear on Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700)
References: <3A578F27.D2A9DF52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010107042959.A14330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A580B31.7998C783@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010107062744.A15198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A58249F.86DD52BC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A597665.4B68C39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
   Date:        Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:12:21 -0700
   From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   (If you can't get to it, let me know and I'll email it to you...some
    cable modem networks have I firewalled.)

It just seems that this shows that the implementation of ifconfig can
be improved, since "ip" can do the same thing several orders of
magnitude better (ie. non-quadratic system time complexity).

This is the argument I started with when this thread began, so my
position hasn't changed, it has in fact been well supported by your
tests :-)

David S. Miller

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>