| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!) |
| From: | Blu3Viper <david@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 22:13:06 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, cw@xxxxxxxx, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010108063214.A29026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > > If this is really true, 2.5.x is an appropriate time to make > > this, no sooner. > > I think it would be better to keep it. The ifa based alias interface > emulation adds minor overhead (currently it's only a few lines of code, > assuming we need named if addresses for other reasons too, which we do) > and removing it it would break a lot of configuration scripts etc., for > no really good gain. How about turning it out with a legacy/deprecated CONFIG_ option so we can prepare people. For now it can default to enabled. -d |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), Blu3Viper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!), David Ford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |