netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!

To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:36:23 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ak@xxxxxxx>, <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010107183032.E28257@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Gleb Natapov wrote:

> > I used to be against VLANS being devices, i am withdrawing that comment; 
> > it's
> > a lot easier to look on them as devices if you want to run IP on them. And
> > in this case, it makes sense the possibilirt of  over a thousand devices
> > is good.
> >
>
> Glad to hear :) So perhaps this is a good time to move one of VLAN 
> implementations
> into the official kernel?
>

Absolutely.
I think we need a VLAN implementation in there.

cheers,
jamal



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>