netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:30:32 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, ak@xxxxxxx, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101071026070.18916-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from hadi@xxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:56:23AM -0500
References: <200101070543.VAA24689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0101071026070.18916-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:56:23AM -0500, jamal wrote:
[snip]
> 
> I used to be against VLANS being devices, i am withdrawing that comment; it's
> a lot easier to look on them as devices if you want to run IP on them. And
> in this case, it makes sense the possibilirt of  over a thousand devices
> is good.
>

Glad to hear :) So perhaps this is a good time to move one of VLAN 
implementations
into the official kernel?

--
                        Gleb.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>