netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

To: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ben Greear)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:42:50 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller), linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3A57EB5E.966C91DA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Ben Greear" at Jan 06, 2001 09:06:54 PM
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> + *      NOTE:  That is no longer true with the addition of VLAN tags.  Not
> + *             sure which should go first, but I bet it won't make much
> + *             difference if we are running VLANs.  The good news is that

It makes a lot of difference tha the vlan goes 2nd. Most sane people wont
have vlans active on a high load interface.

>                       strcpy(dev->name, buf);
>                       return i;
>               }
>       }
> -     return -ENFILE; /* Over 100 of the things .. bail out! */
> +     return -ENFILE; /* Over 8192 of the things .. bail out! */

So fix the algorithm. You want the list sorted at this point, or to generate
a bitmap of free/used entries and scan the list then scan the map

Question: How do devices with hardware vlan support fit into your model ?

Alan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>