| To: | eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: lapb module irq context problems |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Dec 2000 15:00:09 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200012222302.AAA19224@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Henner Eisen on Sat, 23 Dec 2000 00:02:49 +0100) |
| References: | <200012192332.AAA11827@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200012201820.KAA10981@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200012222302.AAA19224@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 00:02:49 +0100 From: Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> As the input path of the lapb protocol is not trivial (it could even trigger additional output to acknowledge the revied frame), moving the whole protocol processing from hard irq to soft irq might be a good idea anyway. Moving all packet work out of hardirq certainly simplified ipv4 greatly, which is as complex as any :-) Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: lapb module irq context problems, Henner Eisen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | netdevice interface changes in 2.4.0test13pre4ac1, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: lapb module irq context problems, Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | CBQ performance?, Kang-won Lee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |