| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:51:46 +0100 |
| Cc: | kai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200012151606.IAA20579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from davem@xxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:06:21AM -0800 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012151332190.32035-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200012151606.IAA20579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:06:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Question is: Is this the right way to handle this problem, or should > netif_rx be smarter and take unalignment skbs? > BTW: Would the above realigning make sense on other archs, too > (for performance reasons)? > > No, the MIPS port must handle unaligned memory accesses traps > in kernel mode and fix them up. Every port is required to > do this, these can happen anywhere in the networking. We do handle them on MIPS - since ca. '95 or so ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, Johannes Erdfelt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: alignment issues on netif_rx, Kai Germaschewski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |