| To: | eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch: x25-iface / lapb reliability |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:53:03 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, alan@xxxxxxxxxx, gorgo@xxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200011082223.XAA01293@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (message from Henner Eisen on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 23:23:38 +0100) |
| References: | <200011082223.XAA01293@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 23:23:38 +0100 From: Henner Eisen <eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I've done several tests with the lapbether driver by simulating netif_rx() backlog congestion and verified that it works. For the other drivers, I checked that they compile o.k. (anc cc'ed to the maintainers) Patch applied, thanks a lot. BTW, on the 2.2.x side I would be more than willing to accept a patch which makes netif_rx() return appropriate error codes to match 2.4.x. Then you could solve this cleanly in both cases. Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug in TCP/IP stack in 2.2.17? (fwd), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug in TCP/IP stack in 2.2.17? (fwd), Patrik Rak |
| Previous by Thread: | patch: x25-iface / lapb reliability, Henner Eisen |
| Next by Thread: | Bug in TCP/IP stack in 2.2.17? (fwd), Patrik Rak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |