| To: | davej@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2 |
| From: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 07 Nov 2000 20:05:35 +1100 |
| Cc: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3A06C552.4062884C@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011061702410.18587-100000@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
davej@xxxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > processor : 0 > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > > cpu family : 6 > > model : 5 > > model name : Celeron (Covington) > > stepping : 1 > > cpu MHz : 400.000920 > > cache size : 0 KB /* huh? */ > > Original Celeron's were cacheless. You either have one of these, > or you have your cache switched off in the BIOS. As an experiment I went into BIOS and selected "Internal cache: Disabled" and it then took about 30 seconds to uncompress the kernel. It normally takes ~1 second. I guess American Megatrends think that "Internal Cache" is an appropriate name for an offboard L2. Shrug. Surprising amount of difference for an offboard cache though. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Karn's rule in Linux TCP, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MMIO ne2k-pci? (was Re: [patch] NE2000), Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, davej |
| Next by Thread: | 2.4.0-test10 and tcp_input.c(1203), Petr Vandrovec |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |