| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2 |
| From: | davej@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3A06C552.4062884C@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 5 > model name : Celeron (Covington) > stepping : 1 > cpu MHz : 400.000920 > cache size : 0 KB /* huh? */ Original Celeron's were cacheless. You either have one of these, or you have your cache switched off in the BIOS. regards, Davej. -- | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~davej | SuSE Labs |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.0-test10 and tcp_input.c(1203), Petr Vandrovec |
| Previous by Thread: | Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |