| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx (jamal) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:38:02 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.20.0011051948220.2665-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "jamal" at Nov 6, 0 04:45:01 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > So far there is a proposal by Sally Floyd and company which neither Alexey > nor Davem are thrilled about. I know i am not. I am thrilled. And I have to say honestly: when some daring hero will prepare patch implementing this new bug, it is pretty useless to submit it to me. When I am thrilled in such extent, I used to lose patches in backlogs silently. This happens without any intention, just occasionally. 8)8) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Strange accept() behaviour in 2.2, davej |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CONFIG_INET_ECN creates problems, Rusty Russell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |