Re: [patch] NE2000

netdev

Re: [patch] NE2000

To:	jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jeff Garzik)
Subject:	Re: [patch] NE2000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:34:06 +0000 (GMT)
Cc:	pavel@xxxxxxxxxxx (pavel rabel), linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, p_gortmaker@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Linux Kernel Mailing List)
In-reply-to:	<39FC83CD.B10BF08D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Jeff Garzik" at Oct 29, 2000 03:08:45 PM
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

> This change sounds ok to me, if noone else objects.  (I added to the CC
> a bit)  I saw that code, and was thinking about doing the same thing
> myself.  ne2k-pci.c definitely has changes which are not included in
> ne.c, and it seems silly to duplicate ne2000 PCI support.

Unless there are any cards that need the bug workarounds in ne.c for use
on PCI then I see no problem. I've not heard of any.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [patch] NE2000, Jeff Garzik Re: [patch] NE2000, Alan Cox <= Re: [patch] NE2000, Jorge Nerin Re: [patch] NE2000, Paul Gortmaker Re: [patch] NE2000, pavel rabel Re: [patch] NE2000, Jeff Garzik Re: [patch] NE2000, Paul Gortmaker

Previous by Date:	Re: [patch] NE2000, Jeff Garzik
Next by Date:	Re: tcp.c::wait_for_tcp_memory() buggy ?, Ingo Molnar
Previous by Thread:	Re: [patch] NE2000, Jeff Garzik
Next by Thread:	Re: [patch] NE2000, Jorge Nerin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]