| To: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface |
| From: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Sep 2000 22:34:07 +1100 |
| Cc: | "howling@xxxxxxxx" <havanna_moon@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <39C883CF.9FB262FC@xxxxxxxxxx>, <39C5D263.8DA31C03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39C75CB6.E86C55F@xxxxxxxxxx> <008101c02276$fe4fc5a0$1cac243e@dustin> <39C883CF.9FB262FC@xxxxxxxxxx> <200009201612.e8KGC6x14517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Richard Gooch wrote: > > Andrew Morton writes: > > But if someone is setting up a multi-node HA system or a router, > > it's not unreasonable to expect them to fork out the $$$ for a NIC > > which generates link status change interrupts, and to be prepared to > > use twisted pair. > > Such as the 3c59x? Yep. 3c905B. 905C and most of the Cardbus NICs. I don't know how useful the whole link-state-change-interrupt thing is in practice. The HA guys would, I suspect, say "thanks very much" and continue to use application-level heartbeating, as they should. We (I) need to ask them, and verify that there is actually a use for this interface before running away and coding stuff. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, Richard Gooch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, Richard Gooch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |