| To: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface |
| From: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:12:06 -0600 |
| Cc: | "howling@xxxxxxxx" <havanna_moon@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <39C883CF.9FB262FC@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <39C5D263.8DA31C03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39C75CB6.E86C55F@xxxxxxxxxx> <008101c02276$fe4fc5a0$1cac243e@dustin> <39C883CF.9FB262FC@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andrew Morton writes:
> But if someone is setting up a multi-node HA system or a router,
> it's not unreasonable to expect them to fork out the $$$ for a NIC
> which generates link status change interrupts, and to be prepared to
> use twisted pair.
Such as the 3c59x?
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | dev->hard_start_xmit return val handling correct?, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |