netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface

To: "Andrew Morton" <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface
From: "howling@xxxxxxxx" <havanna_moon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:02:20 +0200
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <39C5D263.8DA31C03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <39C75CB6.E86C55F@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>;
<jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface


> The users of a select()able carrier detect would be desktop UIs and
the
> high-availability guys.  The latter is a guess - I don't really know
if
> people who are concerned about failover would find a carrier-lost
> indication useful.  TBD.
Routers have a tendency not to announce routes for networks

that are physically down, i miss that in linux. Mr. Becker

suggested using libmii was a no-no-never solution (up to a few

ms lockup of the machine per poll) for this issue. Select as

you suggest seems ideal.



HAND

 yon





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>