| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Preallocated skb's? |
| From: | Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:06:03 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200009140836.BAA22073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote: > Does anyone think that allocating skbs during system idle time > would be useful? > > I really don't like these sorts of things, because it makes an > assumption as to what memory is about to be used for. I agree. Surely The Linux Way (tm) would be to make the allocations so cheap that prealocation would gain you nothing. Matthew. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Preallocated skb's?, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Preallocated skb's?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Preallocated skb's?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Preallocated skb's?, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |