netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH] possible netlink_set_err() fix

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] possible netlink_set_err() fix
From: Jan Echternach <echter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:01:40 +0200
In-reply-to: <20000816173416.A27392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from echter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:34:16PM +0200
Mail-followup-to: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20000816173416.A27392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jan Echternach <jan.echternach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

I'm not sure if this patch for 2.4.0-test7 is correct, but it makes
netlink_set_err() behave the same as netlink_overrun() in that it tests
the bit 0 of sk->protinfo.af_netlink->state before actually setting the
error.

-- 
Jan

Attachment: patch-2.4.0-test7-seterr1
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [PATCH] possible netlink_set_err() fix, Jan Echternach <=