| To: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: nfmark routing in ip_route_output() |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2000 16:16:03 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ges@xxxxxxxxxx, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000831112911.D927B816F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200008131630.UAA04346@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000831112911.D927B816F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Rusty Russell writes: > In message <200008131630.UAA04346@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> you write: > > If you do not want to depend on skb, add new function using > > rt_key as argument. You may even replace ip_route_output() > > with this new function everywhere, it will be a bit slower, > > but it is worth to do, because has lots of useful applications > > not bound to nfmark. > > OK. This is minimal source level change, so I don't break routing > code this close to 2.4.0. > This patch looks fine, I've applied it. Alexey can complain next week when he comes back online. :-) Later, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: nfmark routing in ip_route_output(), Rusty Russell |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: nfmark routing in ip_route_output(), Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | problems with creating tunnel, Jorg de Jong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |