Re: inet_ntop...

netdev

Re: inet_ntop...

To:	aaguirre@xxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: inet_ntop...
From:	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI (吉藤英明) <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 15 Jul 2000 02:56:45 +0900
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200007141640.MAA14594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200007141640.MAA14594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

In article <200007141640.MAA14594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 14 Jul 2000 
12:40:28 -0400 (CST)), Armando Aguirre Schlick <aaguirre@xxxxxxxx> says:

>     I defined hbuf2 as "char *" and "i" is ok.
>     
>     What's wrong??

"OK"?  Why did you think so?
Show the definitions/declarations in AS-IS format as possible.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/
PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515  1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
inet_ntop..., Armando Aguirre Schlick Re: inet_ntop..., 吉藤英明 <=

Previous by Date:	inet_ntop..., Armando Aguirre Schlick
Next by Date:	Re: TCP - Kernel module. Success!!, Andy
Previous by Thread:	inet_ntop..., Armando Aguirre Schlick
Next by Thread:	bonding driver + slave device (net/core) fix, Andreas Steinmetz
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]