Hello,
> > and receiving; the same thing for forwarding would result in an "always
> > defragment" option, which would be somewhat "un-ip6-ish" :-)
> It is anti-ip4-ish with the same success. 8)
:-)
> My personal opinion is that current mobile IPv6 is one big piece
> of shit yet. 8)8) Piggibacking such options to data packets
> introduces no advantages, but lots of troubles.
It's even worse... I am working on IPsec ;-)
The solution you described seems to be the only possibility for the moment.
I am trying to calculate the size of the new headers, thus determining the
new ext_header_len. As a second step, I do my modifications in ip6_xmit/
ip6_build_xmit.
A general interface for this work would be ugly, but at least there would
be an interface ;-)
Any comments?
Stefan.
--
*--- please cut here... -------------------------------------- thanks! ---*
|-> E-Mail: stefan.schlott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx DH-PGP-Key: 0x2F36F4FE <-|
| HAL 9000 [nervous] : "Dave, put down those Windows disks !!!" |
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
|