| To: | rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rusty Russell) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: iptable_nat seriously b0rken |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:35:29 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20000706040944.C97BB8195@halfway> from "Rusty Russell" at Jul 7, 0 05:14:11 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Dave, please merge. Having tunnels pass the entunnelled packets > through the LOCAL_OUT hook is nicer anyway (from a filtering and > least-surprise perspective), and allows my connection tracking code to > do its magic... Well, Paul, but could you drop a note, _why_ it failed to work without this? Seems, something is more fundamentally wrong yet. It is not a minor surprise. 8) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | tcpdump on Solaris 2.6, Chanaka Mendis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Re: [RFC] solution for the inet_ntoa problem, buffer allocator, Oliver Xymoron |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: iptable_nat seriously b0rken, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Adding of destination options in IPv6, Lars Henrik Petander |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |