| To: | Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ??? |
| From: | Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 11 Jun 2000 05:15:34 +0200 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, buytenh@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Gleb Natapov's message of "Sat, 10 Jun 2000 17:54:38 +0300 (IDT)" |
| References: | <Pine.OSF.3.96-heb-2.07.1000610174812.19185A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "Gleb" == Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> jamal> Did i miss anything? jamal> Gleb> Yes. If you are going to implement VLANs as you've just Gleb> described you will have to change each L3 protocol Gleb> implementation to support VLANs. >> Gleb, I am afraid i didnt understand you. You mean broken programs >> like DHCP? Gleb> No, I mean IPV6, IPX, DECnet, appletalk etc. You mean all the ones that are practically unused (and the used ones which should never have been used in the first place: IPX + AppleTalk). Jes |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Gleb Natapov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Gleb Natapov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Gleb Natapov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |