netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp)

To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp)
From: Jerome Etienne <jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 12:35:18 -0400
Cc: Jerome Etienne <jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006091926150.22344-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:29:48PM +0300
References: <20000609095319.A921@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006091926150.22344-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.0i
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:29:48PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>       Good luck! IFA_F_NO_NDISC is not a complete solution
> for  LVS. The "hidden" flag has  other semantic and the goal
> is to mark part of the local addresses as shared (hidden).
> This is different from IFA_F_NO_NDISC. We need to control
> which addresses can be announced in the ARP probes too.

how do you need to control them ?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>