| To: | jetienne@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp) |
| From: | Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:29:47 +0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20000608130323.A1049@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from "Jerome Etienne" on Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 01:03:23PM |
| References: | <20000608142528.A11492@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006081442540.4362-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000608130323.A1049@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 01:03:23PM -0400, Jerome Etienne wrote:
> Why not provide a mechanism allowing to handle ARP request/reply from
> userspace ? (af_packet to sniff the reply from the network, a flag
> to prevent the kernel from replying and a kind of CONFIG_ARPD to
> send ARP request to userspace via netlink)
I think it is a very good solution.
This area just needs certain cleanup to allow all the decisions to be made in
user-space. I'm not very familiar with "neighbour" code and I can't point to
the right places.
> It would be flexilbe and would satisfy the needs of my other project and
> vrrp. i think it would be enough for lvs too, correct ?
Best regards
Andrey V.
Savochkin
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Jerome Etienne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IFA_F_NO_NDISC (for vrrp), Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |