| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ??? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:01:20 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006062106130.17520-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Lennert Buytenhek on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:21:39PM +0200 |
| References: | <20000605102627.A8473@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006062106130.17520-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:21:39PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote: > > > The current kernel infrastructure for packet mangling may still need > > some adjustments, but it at least exists. I'm encouraging to consider > > VLAN implementation as just a netfilter module. > > "All the world is an IP net"? How should I run IPX over my VLANs then? Netfilter is not an IP only thing. It is a generic framework for packet mangling. Although currently only IPv4 and IPv6 netfilter implementations exist it would be no big problem to add ``raw ethernet'' netfilter hooks. -Andi -- This is like TV. I don't like TV. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Support for many devices in the kernel (Was 802.1q), Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Slow TCP connection between linux and wince, Aki M Laukkanen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Matthew Geier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |