netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:09:51 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rob@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20000605102627.A8473@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote:

> I think that the current VLAN implementation slightly abuses the
> notion of device.  And it doesn't relate to the number of devices and
> the efficiency of search algorithms.  The current VLAN implementation
> is a pure packet-mangling code.  It misses one of the most important
> properties of network devices - flow control.  Any code that doesn't
> provide flow control isn't a device, but a code just manipulating of
> packet contents.

>From this I may conclude that current (2.3) bridging is broken too as it
works as a device?


greetings,
Lennert



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>