| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ??? |
| From: | Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 02 Jun 2000 11:36:11 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Fri, 02 Jun 2000 08:06:04 EDT." <Pine.GSO.4.20.0006020741140.13652-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>>>> "jamal" == jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
jamal> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> "jamal" == jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
jamal> What is the specific reason that you insist on mapping a VLAN
>>
>> It is a nice abtraction. It has known interfaces (ifconfig,
netstat,route).
>>
jamal> hope my comments above answer this.
Nope... you talk a lot about internal data structures. That's nice, but so
what? I want to know what the userland interface is.
:!mcr!: | Solidum Systems Corporation, http://www.solidum.com
Michael Richardson |For a better connected world,where data flows faster<tm>
Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
mailto:mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:mcr@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Rob Walker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???, Jim_March |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |