[Top] [All Lists]

802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

To: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 20:26:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3933777C.E562388C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Your architecture of maintaining a device per VLAN does not scale;
(as you might have heard from your numerous attempts to change device
What is the specific reason that you insist on mapping a VLAN to a device?
Have you thought of using a VLAN lookup table instead? 


I am only asking because i think that sooner than later we need to have
802.1p/q in the kernel and your current scheme is problematic. 
BTW, it seems there is another 802.1p/q project at sourceforge; 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>